Phase 02: Safety & Sandboxing - Security assessment levels defined - Audit logging scope established - Sandbox technology decisions made - Resource limits policy set
This commit is contained in:
66
.planning/phases/02-safety-sandboxing/02-CONTEXT.md
Normal file
66
.planning/phases/02-safety-sandboxing/02-CONTEXT.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
|
||||
# Phase 02: Safety & Sandboxing - Context
|
||||
|
||||
**Gathered:** 2026-01-27
|
||||
**Status:** Ready for planning
|
||||
|
||||
<domain>
|
||||
## Phase Boundary
|
||||
|
||||
Implement sandbox execution environment for generated code, multi-level security assessment, audit logging with tamper detection, and resource-limited container execution.
|
||||
|
||||
</domain>
|
||||
|
||||
<decisions>
|
||||
## Implementation Decisions
|
||||
|
||||
### Security Assessment Levels
|
||||
- **BLOCKED triggers:** Code analysis detects malicious patterns AND known threats; behavioral patterns limited to external code (not Mai herself)
|
||||
- **HIGH triggers:** Privileged access attempts (admin/root access, system file modifications, privilege escalation)
|
||||
- **BLOCKED response:** Request user override with explanation before proceeding
|
||||
- **Claude's Discretion:** Specific pattern matching algorithms and threshold tuning
|
||||
|
||||
### Audit Logging Scope
|
||||
- **Logging level:** Comprehensive logging of all code execution, file access, network calls, and system modifications
|
||||
- **Log content:** Timestamps, code diffs, security events, resource usage, and violation reasons
|
||||
- **Claude's Discretion:** Log retention period, storage format, and alerting mechanisms
|
||||
|
||||
### Sandbox Technology
|
||||
- **Implementation:** Docker containers for isolation with configurable resource limits and easy cleanup
|
||||
- **Network policy:** Read-only internet access (can fetch dependencies/documentation but cannot send arbitrary requests)
|
||||
- **Claude's Discretion:** Container configuration, security policies, and isolation mechanisms
|
||||
|
||||
### Resource Limits
|
||||
- **Policy:** Configurable quotas based on task complexity and trust level
|
||||
- **Dynamic allocation:** Allow 2 CPU cores, 1GB RAM, 2 minute execution time for trusted code
|
||||
- **Resource monitoring:** Real-time tracking and automatic termination on limit violations
|
||||
- **Claude's Discretion:** Specific quota amounts, monitoring frequency, and response to violations
|
||||
|
||||
### Claude's Discretion
|
||||
- Audit log retention: Choose appropriate retention policy balancing security and storage
|
||||
- Sandbox security policies: Choose appropriate container hardening measures
|
||||
- Network whitelist: Determine which domains are safe for dependency access
|
||||
- Performance optimization: Balance security overhead with execution efficiency
|
||||
|
||||
</decisions>
|
||||
|
||||
<specifics>
|
||||
## Specific Ideas
|
||||
|
||||
- Audit logs should be tamper-proof and include cryptographic signatures
|
||||
- Docker containers should use read-only filesystems where possible
|
||||
- Security assessment should be fast to avoid blocking user workflow
|
||||
- Resource limits should adapt to available system resources
|
||||
|
||||
</specifics>
|
||||
|
||||
<deferred>
|
||||
## Deferred Ideas
|
||||
|
||||
None — discussion stayed within Phase 2 scope of safety and sandboxing.
|
||||
|
||||
</deferred>
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
*Phase: 02-safety-sandboxing*
|
||||
*Context gathered: 2026-01-27*
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user